[INAAPT] Fwd: AAPT workshops

[Steve Spicklemire]

Hi Folks,

I got this from Rosaline, and I thought I'd forward it to the list.

For what it's worth (and while I have your attention) I thought the  
meeting at Rose was managed wonderfully! Thanks to all those  
involved, Mike, Julie, Duane and Rob, and everyone else for that matter.

;-)

It's only a shame that such a great meeting was so poorly attended.  
Only about 30 of us showed up for this time around. I hope more folks  
can come next year. Both UIndy and IU offered to host next year, and  
last I heard we (UIndy) were going to host the 2008 meeting, and IU  
was planning to host in 2009. We also discussed the possibility of  
moving the meeting to the fall. We'll need to make that decision  
*before* the next spring meeting if we want to do it during the  
2008/2009 academic year, so if you have an opinion.. let's hear it!

On that note, If you have something (e.g., picture, thoughts, etc)  
that would be good for the web site, you can either post them  
yourself, after you log in to your account, or you can send them to  
me, and I can post them for you.

I'd also like to point out that any subscriber to this list can post  
messages simply by addressing their email to:

inaapt at inaapt.org

Some folks apparently have the impression that they need to send  
messages through me. I assure you it's not true!

Anyway.. on to the note from Rosaline!

take care,
-steve

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Rosaline Secrest <rlsecrest at hughes.net>
> Date: April 22, 2007 7:10:29 PM EDT
> To: Steve Spicklemire <steve at spvi.com>
> Subject: AAPT workshops
>
> Hello Steve,
>
> In light of my question and our discussion yesterday regarding the  
> loss of
> the Announcer and the difficulty of seeing the abstracts of the  
> workshops
> for the summer AAPT meeting, I thought I would pass along the fact  
> that
> today when I went online to the AAPT website, I see that the  
> abstracts are
> now available without registering.  Perhaps those in charge got some
> complaints and responded.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rosaline
>
>